CSO

One particular vendor claims they are the "safest web browser" - but are they really? Follow this series of articles to see if the claims can stand up to close scrutiny.

2007, who cares? What have you done for me lately? Let's take a look at some Client/Desktop/Workstation operating systems and see which users had the most ... and the least pain from vulnerabilities and patching from January through March 2008.

You've been hearing the stories about how people just want to stick with Windows XP SP2, but Windows Vista security is supposed to be better. Do you wonder how many vulnerabilities and patches each one had in 2007? Read on...

SQL Server has come a long way in the past 5 years, though the history seems to linger. Let's look at the recent history and see what the story is with database vulnerabilities.

Building upon the progress made in Windows Server 2003, SQL Server 2005 and Visual Studio 2005, Microsoft today launched the new generation of each of these products.

Okay, so you had some further questions after reading my Windows Vista One Year Vulnerability Analysis. So, did Jesper Johannson, but he decided to do the analysis and find some answers. Read here to see what questions he asked ... and then go look at the findings.

Having published a Windows Vista vulnerability report after 90-days and six-months, I am sure it will come as no surprise to folks that I have been working on a one year analysis as well. Take a look at this post to see some highlights and then download and read the full report.

Internet Explorer or Firefox - Which way should you go? If I asked you which browser had the better record in terms of security vulnerabilities, I know what your guess might be, but do you know for sure? Want to find out?

Is that vulnerability a High Severity, Critical, Highly Critical, or Low? Or maybe it is a "minor issue". It probably depends on who you ask. In this first of a multi-part series, I look at vendor and third-party severity rating systems.