Kurtz: “Militarization of Cyberspace is Here”
Sun, 2009-02-22 22:17
Topic(s):

In the opening address at the Black Hat Federal security conference in Arlington, VA, Paul E. Kurtz urged the nation to begin a new discussion on the proper role of government in regulating and defending cyberspace. Kurtz said a clear command and control structure was needed to protect our critical information infrastructure and recover from major Internet disruptions.

The speech was especially significant since Paul Kurtz recently served as the cybersecurity adviser on President Obama's transition team. Kurtz has also served on National and Homeland Security councils under presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.

Bill Jackson at Defensesystems.com outlined the major points from Kurtz's presentation. Here are a few highlights:

“To those who object to the militarization of cyberspace, I would say, it’s too late: We’re already there,” Kurtz said.

"He said the United States should apply some of the lessons learned during the Cold War to cyber conflicts now simmering online. Cyber warfare is not as simple as the bipolar confrontation between the Western democracies and the Soviet bloc, Kurtz said. It is multilateral standoff involving multiple nations, shadowy organizations, and individual hackers and criminals."

 While we wait for the outcome of the new administration's 60-day cybersecurity review, this speech offers some new ideas and thoughts that should be closely examined. Many from the private sector will likely disagree with elements of Kurtz's proposals, but they deserve serious consideration and public debate.

While I am a proponent of state government rights, it is clear that more needs to be done with state and local governments across the nation regarding the protection of cybersecurity networks and information assets. New command and control structures will likely be needed as well - especially for emergencies.

The bigger questions arise with the private sector and how this will work with the Internet and other countries.

What are your thoughts on Paul Kurtz's speech?     

Reader Feedback
Thu, 2009-02-26 23:45
Malware
By Anonymous

What controlls are there in place to ensure that the public is protected against malicious code inserted into commercial applications released by say Microsoft. If a terrorist infiltrated the Microsoft corporation and added back doors to the next operating system or system hotfix to be released. What systems are in place to protect against this happening?

Shouldn't there be a regulatory authority to protect the public against this?? Just as there is with other consumer items such as food and drugs.

Should there not be a stamp of approval from an independant authority other than the manufacturer??

Do we have to rely on hackers to find the holes and backdoors to the software that is sold to the public??

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
* Denotes a required field
VIRTUAL CONFERENCE
Security Directions: A Virtual Conference

Security Directions Available On Demand Sept. 30 - Dec. 30

Join us for a virtual event with candid, expert information on top security challenges and issues - all from the comfort of your desktop.

» Register Now

WEBCAST
Protecting PII: How to Work with IT to Manage Risk

Compuware Understand the critical nature of the test data privacy problem and get tips on how to work with IT to implement a test data privacy program.

» View this Webcast