It was one of the most closely watched election contests this month: New York's 23rd Congressional district pitted Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman against Democrat Bill Owens and Republican Dierdre Scozzafava. Pundits portrayed the race as a contest for the soul of the Republican party, with Hoffman aligned with the more conservative, mad-as-hell-and-not-going-to-take-it-anymore side of the GOP.
VIRUS in the VOTING MACHINES: Tainted Results in NY-23
Written by Nathan Barker
GOUVERNEUR, NY - The computerized voting machines used by many voters in the 23rd district had a computer virus - tainting the results, not just from those machines known to have been infected, but casting doubt on the accuracy of counts retrieved from any of the machines.
Luckily, (or unluckily, depending on your point of view) it doesn't look like there was a virus in Hamilton County.
The New York State Board of Elections quickly issued a statement on the Gouverneur Times's report, blasting it as "full of inaccurate information." The story "unfortunately quoted a single word from a commissioner who mischaracterized the issue in question."
I tried to reach Cathleen Rogers on Monday, but didn't hear back from her or from the Hamilton County Board of Elections. The paper's rebuttal (Hey, she said it!) to this statement can be found here.
The State Board did say there was a bug with the machines, however. Apparently they would freeze up when voters were allowed to choose more than one candidate in any given race. On election day, some of the scanners froze, and were then taken out of commission.
Voting machine expert Joseph Hall is satisfied with the Board's explanation. "As far as we can tell, it's not a virus," he said. Rogers simply "misspoke, as far as we can tell," said Hall, a research associate with Princeton's Center for Information Technology Policy.
Hall, like many e-voting experts, believes that it's possible for a virus to be placed on an e-voting machine, so if there were anything to this story, he'd be all over it.





